Coalition Forms to Challenge Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan

We've reported in the past about some of the regulatory takings issues created as a result of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's ("RCA") efforts to conserve property pursuant to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP").  It now appears that those conservation efforts have created quite the turmoil with citizens in the City of Murrieta.

According to a recent North County Times article, "MURRIETA: Landowners frustrated with conservation board, city leaders who refuse to meet," about 100 members have organized a group called the Members of Citizens for Quality of Life in Murrieta in an effort to get the City's and the RCA's attention about the ramifications of the MSHCP.  In particular, the property owners are frustrated with the MSHCP process and how they've been unable to develop their property without having to give up large portions of their land

The article recounts stories we've heard from many property owners, describing the exhausting maze of paperwork that must be completed, the hundreds of thousands of dollars that must be spent on biological studies, and the repeated denial of any attempt to ultimately develop.  And at the end of the process, the owners claim that they are often left with little choice but to sign a contingent, below-market-value purchase agreement proposed by the RCA that, according to one owner, "will destroy your ability to ever sell your land."

The group wants a sit-down meeting with the City and the RCA, but so far, that meeting has been rebuked.  The reason, according to the City and the RCA, is due to the fact that there is a pending lawsuit brought by the Calvary Chapel - Murrieta seeking $25 million in damages as a result of the MSHCP's designating the church's 118-acre property for conservation.  It will be interesting to follow that lawsuit and the impact it has on negotiations with other owners.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.californiaeminentdomainreport.com/admin/trackback/224961
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
MaryAnn Miller - October 11, 2010 10:30 AM

Thank you for your coverage. CQLM is representing neighbors in a 2045 acre area of 2 1/2 acre zoning.
Our infrastructure economic base is being eroded and our lands inversly condemned as we are "picked off" by the RCA. We appear to be the warehouse of MSHCP land for the City of Murrieta so other developments can go forward. Los Alamos has been asking for and promised a Specific Plan for 21 years. There are multiple law suits against the Riverside Conservation Authority but they keep marching along, batting on their averages of "human habitat take".

Joyce Dodd - October 18, 2010 3:58 PM

Your coverage of this atrocity that is being perpetuated on the citizens of the Los Alamos Hills District is greatly appreciated. For many years the area has been under the impression that the City was working on a specific plan that would protect the Personal Property Rights of those living in this area, only to find out that this was just a way for them to placate us into silence while our neighbors were being picked off one by one. Now that we have banded together and are "As Mad As Hell And Won't Take It Anymore" the City Council is rapidly pointing fingers backward, saying "we're so sorry, I wasn't here at that time (1999-2007) buy I agree that something should be done." My big questions has to do with Election Year. Is this just a ploy to get re-elected? I guess we'll see in a month's time. I pray we are not too late.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.