At its meeting last week, the California Transportation Commission allocated $174.8 million to 85 projects around the state. Some of the projects receiving allocations this month include:
- $22.5 million for construction of SR-905/SR-125 connectors in San Diego
- $20 million to realign Highway 1 in San Luis Obispo County away from the eroding shoreline
- $19.4 million to rehabilitate the Elysian Viaduct Bridge in Los Angeles
- $6.3 million for reabilitation of the Sierra Point Overhead bridge near South San Francisco
- $5.9 million to replace the aging Hilt Road Overcrossing on I-5 near Yureka
- $2.8 million to construct a shuttle maintence and repair facility at the Port of Los Angeles
You can find a full list of projects receiving funding here. A large portion of the money came from Proposition 1B, which California voters approved in 2006. As Caltrans reports, over $18 billion of Proposition 1B's $19.925 billion has been allocated to date. In other words, Proposition 1B's coffers are nearly empty. And it is not clear how they will be filled.
History of Proposition 1B
As John Frith posted in his article "Proposition 1B: A Major Success Story," Proposition 1B has been instrumental in paying for major transportation projects througout the state. In Northern California, Prop 1B funds were used to add a fourth bore to the Caldecott Tunnel in Oakland and to build the Lincoln Bypass near Sacramento. The biggest project in Southern California has been Caltrans' widening of I-5 in Los Angeles County -- a project that is still under construction today. However, as Frith points out, Prop 1B is winding down leaving California with a "looming transportation fiscal cliff."
The Highway Trust Fund
California is in much the same position as the rest of the country, where the Highway Trust Fund is nearing insolvency. This graph from the USDOT's "Highway Trust Fund Ticker" paints a disturbing picture:
And it isn't clear whether either California or the Federal government will be able to bring us back from the edge of the cliff. The Highway Trust Fund depends on gas tax revenue and suffers from several challenges including more efficient cars, no increase in the tax in two decades, and people simply driving less. (See the interesting graphs in Philip Bump's post "Why the Highway Trust Fund is running out of money, in 5 graphs."). While Congress extended MAP-21 through May 2015, this was little more than a band-aid solution. Unless Congress acts this term, and soon, the Highway Trust Fund will be out of money. We will be keeping you posted on solutions to this problem.
Enter Governor Brown's Five Year Infrastructure Plan
Meanwhile, back in our state, Governor Brown's 2015 proposed budget includes dollars for infrastructure spending and a "Five Year Infrastructure Plan." And aside from the $815 million in one-time money, the budget draws from at least three sources: the remaining Prop 1B funds; the state's Cap-and-Trade program, and early loan repayments from the General Fund. It is not clear if there will really be enough money to meet the anticipated needs of California's growing population. For an interesting discussion of this issue, see Justin Ewers' article "What will be in Governor Brown's five-year infrastructure plan?" And we will also have to wait and see whether the state legislature will actually approve this budget. But it seems fair to say at this point that with the decline of Prop 1B, the CTC's future allocations will look very different.
California Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain in California. We cover all aspects of eminent domain in California, including condemnation, inverse condemnation, and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts, and report on all major California eminent domain conferences and seminars.
Stay ConnectedRSS Feed
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- Court Decisions
- GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
- Inverse Condemnation & Regulatory Takings
- New Legislation
- Public Agency Law
- Regulatory Reform and Proposed Rules
- Right to Take