City of Newport Beach Authorizes Eminent Domain Action
Posted in Projects

The City of Newport Beach is working on a plan to widen Jamboree Boulevard adjacent to State Route 73 (the northern end of the San Joaquin Hills Toll Road).   The city has acquired much of the property needed for the larger right-of-way, but has not been able to reach agreement with the owner of the Back Bay Court shopping center.   On Tuesday night, the city authorized proceeding with an eminent domain action to acquire the property.

According to a June 9 Orange County Register article by Jeff Overley, "City OKs using eminent domain on mini-mall":

The property is about one-tenth of an acre and consists of a narrow greenbelt that separates Jamboree and a shopping center parking lot.

This description provides good insights about why the city must resort to eminent domain.  From the city's perspective, it is acquiring only a small sliver of landscaping; it is not touching the buildings -- or even the parking lot.  The city presumably believes its $452,000 offer is more than fair for such a minor event. 

So what's the big deal?  From the property owner's perspective, the taking of that small strip of land may have dire consequences.  It may cause the shopping center property to exist as a legal, non-conforming use if the removal of the greenbelt cause the center to fall short of required set-backs.  While not an immediate problem, this could be an issue if someone wants to redevelop the property down the road. 

And, according to the owner's attorney, the "sliver" includes more than landscaping.  The city's project may also eliminate the center's main monument sign and involve construction of a view-limiting retaining wall, very big deals for the tenants.  

Finally, even a small taking can give rise to substantial severance damages if the construction of the project impacts access to the center for any extended period of time.  If the owner loses tenants as a result of the project, it may take a long time to replace them in the current market.  This could mean big losses, for which the owner will presumably want compensation.  

Like most eminent domain cases, this one will probably settle, but it may take time before the city and the owner see eye-to-eye on the scope of the project and its impacts on the center.  Often, these cases settle only after the construction has been completed, giving both sides a better sense of the actual impacts the project and its construction have on the center. 

  • Rick E. Rayl

    Rick Rayl is an experienced litigator on a broad range of complex civil litigation issues.  His practice is concentrated primarily on eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and other real-estate-valuation disputes.  His public ...

California Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain. We cover all aspects of eminent domain, including condemnation, inverse condemnation and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts and report on all major eminent domain conferences and seminars in the Western United States.

Stay Connected




View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

We use cookies on this website to improve functionality, enhance performance, analyze website traffic and to enable social media features. To learn more, please see our Privacy Policy and our Terms & Conditions for additional detail.