According to a Contra Costa Times article, "San Pablo tries to quell eminent domain fears with promise to residents," the City of San Pablo has promised residents that it will not use the power of eminent domain to acquire owner-occupied residences for purposes of private development. The promise is a bit odd, given the fact that Proposition 99, which Caifornia voters passed in 2008, is intended to prohibit exactly that use of eminent domain. (We'll leave aside for the moment whether Proposition 99 really does effectively prohibit the taking of residential property for redevleopment.)
The article notes that over 100 individuals showed up at a recent city council meeting to oppose a proposal to renew the redevelopment agency's eminent domain powers for another 12 years. In an effort to calm the residents' fears, the City took a symbolic step and pledged to sign agreements with any homeowner-in-residence, "promising not to use eminent domain improperly."
Notably, citizens correctly pointed out that the proposal does nothing to protect business owners, and given the fact that more than 90 percent of the City of San Pablo is within a redevelopment area, one can imagine it is difficult for such owners to feel secure.
Brad Kuhn, Chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain & Valuation Group, guides private and public sector clients through complex real estate development and infrastructure projects – particularly with eminent domain/inverse ...
California Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain in California. We cover all aspects of eminent domain in California, including condemnation, inverse condemnation, and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts, and report on all major California eminent domain conferences and seminars.
Stay ConnectedRSS Feed
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- Court Decisions
- GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
- Inverse Condemnation & Regulatory Takings
- New Legislation
- Public Agency Law
- Regulatory Reform and Proposed Rules
- Right of Way
- Right to Take