Here's a new one. Imagine you have a government agency as your tenant, paying above-market rent, and the lease is set to expire. The government tells you they're going to move to a new site, but they need to hold over for a while until the new site is built. You figure, fine, the parties will just continue with the same rental rate until the government tenant moves. Hey, what other option does the government have? It would be incredibly expensive to find a temporary site and do a temporary move until the permanent relocation site is finalized.
This logic may work with any typical private-market tenant. But this is the government. What power does the government have that others do not? You got it: the power to condemn. But could the government condemn a temporary leasehold interest in a building just because it can't negotiate a rental rate with the landlord? This exact story is unfolding as I type in Sacramento.
According to a News 10 story, "Feds use rare tool in Sacramento landlord dispute," the General Services Administration has been embroiled in a bitter dispute with its landlord in attempting to negotiate an eight month extension of its lease that just expired for its Military Entrance Processing Station. The government had been paying $32 per square foot pursuant to its lease, but it doesn't want to pay more than $19 for its short-term extension as it prepares for a move. Unable to negotiate an extension, the government has filed a federal condemnation action to acquire the needed 8 month lease. It's made a deposit of $342,000, which it claims is the fair market value of the leasehold interest it seeks to acquire.
You rarely see a story like this, but it appears there's a bit more behind the story. The landlord recently sued the government, claiming its search for a relocation site had been "subversive, noncompetitive and secretive," which prevented the landlord from bidding to retain the government as a tenant. So, perhaps the government's condemnation action is a trump card, or if nothing else, some sort of leverage to get the overall dispute resolved.
We'll see how this all shakes out.
Brad Kuhn, Chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain & Valuation Group, guides property owners, developers, businesses, utilities, and public agencies through complex real estate development and infrastructure projects – ...Full Bio | All Posts | Email | 949.833.7800
California Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain in California. We cover all aspects of eminent domain in California, including condemnation, inverse condemnation and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts and report on all major California eminent domain conferences and seminars.
Stay ConnectedRSS Feed
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- Court Decisions
- GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
- Inverse Condemnation & Regulatory Takings
- New Legislation
- Public Agency Law
- Regulatory Reform and Proposed Rules
- Right to Take